| Section | Description |
|---|---|
| Type de module | Module d'apprentissage de l'aventure numérique |
| Thème | Identity • Belonging • Micro-interventions |
| Alignement sur les ODD | ODD 16 - Paix, justice et institutions fortes |
| Focus | Responding to subtle harm and assumptions in shared social spaces |
| Groupe cible | Jeunes (environ 13-25 ans), animateurs de jeunesse, éducateurs |
| Format | Expérience numérique interactive basée sur des scénarios |
| Utilisation | Module autonome ou session de groupe animée |
| Objectif | Strengthens learners’ ability to recognise and respond to everyday assumptions linked to identity, preventing the normalisation of exclusion and supporting inclusive, non-violent communication. |
| Approche fondamentale | Focuses on empathy, early intervention, and repair without accusation in moments that often feel “small” but carry lasting impact. |
| Contexte | During a group activity, a casual comment is made suggesting that Samira should know or represent something because of her background. The comment is not intended to offend but lands awkwardly. |
| Défi majeur | Deciding how to respond when harm is subtle, unintentional, and followed by silence. |
| Choix de l'apprenant | Speak up • Check in privately • Gently redirect the moment • Let it pass |
| Leçon | Ce que les apprenants pratiquent |
|---|---|
| Assumptions Can Cause Harm Without Intent | Identifying everyday assumptions and recognising the difference between intention and impact. |
| Silence Reinforces Patterns | Understanding how unaddressed moments become normalised and how gentle interruption can shift norms. |
| Repair Without Accusation | Using curiosity and care to address harm without blame or escalation. |
| À emporter | Focus sur l'apprentissage |
|---|---|
| Center Affected Voices | Asking how the impacted person wants the moment handled, rather than assuming on their behalf. |
| Small Interventions Matter | Using brief, non-confrontational responses to prevent harm from deepening. |
| Learning Over Defensiveness | Inviting reflection instead of triggering shame or self-defence. |
| Questions clés | Why do assumptions feel “small” to some but heavy to others? What makes it difficult to interrupt assumptions in the moment? What is the difference between intention, impact, and responsibility? How can groups create cultures where assumptions are questioned safely? |
| Meilleur pour | Inclusion and belonging programmes • Violence prevention and early-intervention training • Education and workplace dialogue • Peer mediation |
| Compétences développées | Empathy • Inclusive communication • Early intervention • Repair without accusation • Group norm awareness |
Financé par l'Union européenne. Les points de vue et opinions exprimés n'engagent que leurs auteurs et ne reflètent pas nécessairement ceux de l'Union européenne ou de l'Agence exécutive européenne pour l'éducation et la culture (EACEA). Ni l'Union européenne ni l'EACEA ne peuvent en être tenues pour responsables.