| Section | Description |
|---|---|
| Module Type | Digital Adventure Learning Module |
| Theme | Identity • Belonging • Micro-interventions |
| SDG Alignment | SDG 16 – Peace, Justice & Strong Institutions |
| Focus | Responding to subtle harm and assumptions in shared social spaces |
| Target Group | Young people (approx. 13–25), youth workers, educators |
| Format | Interactive, scenario-based digital experience |
| Use | Standalone module or facilitated group session |
| Purpose | Strengthens learners’ ability to recognise and respond to everyday assumptions linked to identity, preventing the normalisation of exclusion and supporting inclusive, non-violent communication. |
| Core Approach | Focuses on empathy, early intervention, and repair without accusation in moments that often feel “small” but carry lasting impact. |
| Context | During a group activity, a casual comment is made suggesting that Samira should know or represent something because of her background. The comment is not intended to offend but lands awkwardly. |
| Key Challenge | Deciding how to respond when harm is subtle, unintentional, and followed by silence. |
| Learner Choices | Speak up • Check in privately • Gently redirect the moment • Let it pass |
| Lesson | What Learners Practice |
|---|---|
| Assumptions Can Cause Harm Without Intent | Identifying everyday assumptions and recognising the difference between intention and impact. |
| Silence Reinforces Patterns | Understanding how unaddressed moments become normalised and how gentle interruption can shift norms. |
| Repair Without Accusation | Using curiosity and care to address harm without blame or escalation. |
| Takeaway | Learning Focus |
|---|---|
| Center Affected Voices | Asking how the impacted person wants the moment handled, rather than assuming on their behalf. |
| Small Interventions Matter | Using brief, non-confrontational responses to prevent harm from deepening. |
| Learning Over Defensiveness | Inviting reflection instead of triggering shame or self-defence. |
| Key Questions | Why do assumptions feel “small” to some but heavy to others? What makes it difficult to interrupt assumptions in the moment? What is the difference between intention, impact, and responsibility? How can groups create cultures where assumptions are questioned safely? |
| Best For | Inclusion and belonging programmes • Violence prevention and early-intervention training • Education and workplace dialogue • Peer mediation |
| Skills Developed | Empathy • Inclusive communication • Early intervention • Repair without accusation • Group norm awareness |
Finanziert von der Europäischen Union. Die geäußerten Ansichten und Meinungen sind jedoch ausschließlich die des Autors/der Autoren und spiegeln nicht unbedingt die der Europäischen Union oder der Europäischen Exekutivagentur für Bildung und Kultur (EACEA) wider. Weder die Europäische Union noch die EACEA können für diese verantwortlich gemacht werden.